Bateleur Brand Planning

World Health Day


Public Opinion Divided Over NHI Bill

In a recent survey conducted by Bateleur Brand Planning, a mixture of opinions emerged, offering insights into the public perceptions surrounding the NHI Bill.


Understanding the Demographics

With a gender split of 35% male and 65% female and an average age of 41 years, the respondents represent a broad spectrum of experiences and perspectives. Geographically, respondents are predominantly located in Gauteng (46%), 22% in the Western Cape, 16% in KwaZulu-Natal, and the remaining 16% residing in other regions of South Africa. 43% are fluent in English, 43% in vernacular languages, and 14% in Afrikaans. In terms of employment status, 49% of respondents are employed full-time, 13% self-employed, 7% working part-time, 11% retired, 5% students, and 14% unemployed.


Current Healthcare Facility Usage

The survey reveals that 33% of respondents utilise government healthcare facilities, 46% opt for private healthcare facilities, and 20% use both government and private facilities.


Awareness and Perceptions of the NHI

While over half of the respondents demonstrate awareness of the NHI Bill, the depth of understanding varies significantly. Amidst this awareness, scepticism looms large, with doubts cast on the NHI’s ability to deliver universal access to quality healthcare. Concerns about the bill’s potential to improve healthcare in public hospitals echo sentiments rooted in a history of healthcare disparities.


Passing the NHI Bill

The debate over passing the NHI Bill encapsulates the polarising nature of healthcare reform. While a slight majority voices support for it (57%), a significant segment remains steadfast in opposition (43%).


Verbatim Comments

  • Many respondents expressed optimism and approval for the NHI Bill, seeing it as a means to provide equal access to healthcare regardless of financial status. They believe it has the potential to improve healthcare services and promote equality in South Africa.
  • However, a significant portion of the comments expressed scepticism and doubt regarding the effectiveness and feasibility of the NHI Bill. Concerns were raised about corruption, poor governance, and the government’s ability to manage such a complex healthcare system.
  • Respondents highlighted practical considerations such as funding, taxation, and the potential impact on medical aid costs. Questions were raised about how the bill would be financed, whether it would lead to increased taxes, and its implications for healthcare affordability.
  • Some comments compared the proposed NHI system with existing healthcare systems in other countries, such as the British NHS. Concerns were raised about waiting times, quality of care, and the financial sustainability of the NHI in comparison to other models.
  • Several respondents emphasised the need to improve existing government healthcare facilities before implementing the NHI Bill. They highlighted issues such as long waiting times, overcrowding, and inadequate staffing and infrastructure.
  • Many comments focused on the potential impact of the NHI Bill on individuals and communities, particularly in terms of access to healthcare and financial burden. Concerns were raised about the potential loss of choice in healthcare providers and the need to ensure that the bill benefits all South Africans.


Overall, the verbatim comments reflect a diverse range of opinions and concerns regarding the NHI Bill, including both support for its objectives and scepticism about its implementation and impact.